Order of the Red Grail
Nebraska Community


The Neo-Pagan Movement and Oppression
Jason J. Blodgett-McDeavitt

For Sociology 481/881
Dr. Tom Calhoun
8 August, 1996

The Neo-pagan Movement and Oppression
Paper Outline

I. Thesis Statement
II. Introduction
III. Description of the Neo-Pagan Movement
A. A Brief History of the Neo-Pagan Movement
B. What the Neo-Pagan Movement is not
1. It is not Satanism
2. It is not a cult
IV. Oppression against Neo-Paganism
A. Historical origins
B. Modern acts of hate
1. Slander Against
2. Acts of Oppression
3. Internal Oppression
a. Witch Wars
b. Negative role models
V. Hope for the future
VI. Conclusion
VII. References
The Neo-Pagan Movement and Oppression

Thesis Statement

This paper will examine the Neo-Pagan movement, with an emphasis on the oppression faced by the movement from external and internal sources.

Introduction

Oppression against religious movements is as old as recorded religion. The Crusades, Christian martyrdom, the destruction of the Cathar and other "heretics", anti-Semitic actions, and the burning of African-American churches in the southern region of the United States, all reflect oppressive and sometimes genocidal acts against members of differing religious groups (Baigent, Leigh, & Lincoln, 1983; Burman, 1984; Chafetes, 1985; Fox, 1986; Minges, 1996; Szlakmann, 1990). Some of these appear to reflect racial overtones, and some do not. The Neo-Pagan movement, although relatively small and primarily White middle class, faces hostility in the form of prejudice and discrimination (Adler, 1986; Finley, 1991; Russell, 1985).

This examination of the Neo-Pagan movement will begin with a look at what Neo-Paganism is, followed by a brief history of the movement. What the movement is not will also be explored. Once a firm understanding of the Neo-Pagan movement has been established, a close look at oppression against the movement can be taken. This will include acts of oppression from inside the movement, as well as outside. Finally, areas in which there has been progress will be looked at, hi lighting the prospect for healthy growth for Neo-Paganism.

Description of the Neo-Pagan Movement

Neo-Paganism describes a wide variety of spiritual practices. Practitioners are Druids, Witches and Wiccans of various traditions, Shamen, Odinists, and all manner of Goddess worshipers (Adler, 1986; Crowley, 1996; Russell, 1985). Although these traditions are distinctly different from one another, they share a number of similar characteristics. With few exceptions, they follow a positive path of worship, are peaceful folk, honor the Earth Mother, are ecologically aware, and tend to be feminist in nature, honoring the feminine aspects of men and women (Finley, 1991; Unger, 1990; Warwick, 1995). Neo-Pagans tend also to be philosophically multicultural in nature and accept, contrary to mainstream religions, that there are multiple truths and not one single way (Adler, 1986; Murphy, 1991).

The number of Neo-Pagans in the United States is difficult, if not impossible to ascertain. Adler (1986) places the number between 40,000 and 100,000. More recent estimations have been anywhere from 100,000 (Unger, 1990) to 200,000 (Murphy, 1991; Warwick, 1995). Some studies show Neo-Paganism as being one of the fastest growing religions in the United States (Crowley, 1996).

Demographics of the Neo-Pagan movement represent a wide spectrum of life in the United States. Most tend to be White, middle class, and well educated (Adler, 1986; Finley, 1991; Russell, 1985), but this is not the rule. Griffin (1995), in her phenomenological study of Feminist Witchcraft, described two covens. One had nine women--seven White, one Chicana, and one African-American and the other had seven women--five White, one Chicana, and one African-American. Murphy (1991) also states that the movement draws members of ethnic and racial minority groups. Neo-Pagans can be found in any walk of life, though the largest number of them work in high technology. Many are computer programmers (Adler, 1986; Crowley, 1996) and they have a very strong presence on the World Wide Web.

Many homosexuals have embraced forms of Neo-Paganism. Gays and lesbians are generally treated with a great degree of acceptance, if not affirmation, of their sexuality within the Neo-Pagan community (Griffin, 1995; Murphy, 1991; Warwick, 1995). There are many mixed covens and groves which include heterosexuals and homosexuals worshipping together in a completely egalitarian environment. There are groups which are entirely heterosexual which still embrace homophobia, but these groups are rare. More and more common are homosexual only groups forming throughout the United States (Adler, 1986).

Wicca has produced a number of homosexual traditions. The Radical Faerie tradition is a male homosexual branch of Wicca. These men examine and develop their inner feminine sides, what Carl Jung and his disciples call the anima (Hillman, 1975). Dianic Wicca is a woman only tradition, primarily followed by lesbians. This particular tradition shuns men from almost all of their ceremonies and worship (Adler, 1986).

A Brief History of the Neo-Pagan Movement

It should be clear by now that it is difficult to fit any two Neo-Pagans into the same mold. Such a spiritual following is diverse and creative. It is not surprising, then, to realize that the histories attributed to the movement are many and varied. Some believe that the movement springs from Paleolithic matriarchal societies (Gardner, 1954; Murray, 1960) or from the romantic histories of the pre-Christian cultures, such as The White Goddess (Graves, 1948/1986) and The Golden Bough (Frazer, 1922/1963).

The more moderate Neo-Pagans, especially Wiccans, accept that the movement is a revival of ancient religion "created" by Gerald Gardner (Adler, 1986; Farrar, 1971). More radical in the Neo-Pagan movement, such as the Church of All Worlds, draw their inspiration from science fiction (Adler, 1986) while others claim to be following the ancient ways via ancestral or astral memories (Ringel, 1994).

What the Neo-Pagan movement is not

The traditional view of Neo-Pagans, especially Witches, is of evil, warty old women doing nasty things to good people, or of sexually promiscuous folks running around naked. These are gross misrepresentations which the media has been slow to change (Russell, 1985). Witches have been accused of cavorting with the Devil since the Middle Ages, and most Neo-Pagan groups are lumped together with other fringe religions and given the label of cult.

Neo-Paganism is Not Satanism

Satanism requires a belief in the fallen angel mythology, or Satan, who is a Christian creation born out of the early cults of Zoroastrianism (Armstrong, 1993; Pagels, 1995; Russell, 1985). Neo-Pagans are not Christian, do not worship a Christian god, nor a Christian devil. In fact, for the most part, there is no deity of ultimate evil in the Neo-Pagan belief structure (WLPA, 1996b). The Church of Set (formerly Church of Satan) is an active Satanic organization which is rejected by Neo-Pagans and Christians alike (Adler, 1986; Russell, 1985). Some Neo-Pagans honor Christian mythology in the same manner of other religious mythologies, as representations of the divine, and as a path to the Godhead (the ultimate expression of the deity towards which all mystics strive) (Andrews, 1993).

It Is Not a Cult

To be a cult, there are certain criteria which must be met. Appel (1983), describes the attributes of a cult as having:

An authoritarian structure, the regimentation of followers, renunciation of the world, and the belief that adherents alone are gifted with the truth. All other qualities associated with cults derive from these characteristics: an attitude of moral superiority, a contempt for secular laws, rigidity of thought, and the diminution of regard for the individual. (p. 17) These things are foreign to the Neo-Pagan movement. Rejection of a strong central authority has kept the movement at such a small size, which is one of the factors which makes it so hard to get an accurate count on how many there really are. Most forms of the movement forbid any form of postulation, believing that those who should be in the movement will find their way into it. Neo-Paganism highlights empowerment, creativity, and individuality above all else and rejects adherence to a strong power structure, professional clergy, and the belief that there is only one way to the truth (Adler, 1986; Crowley, 1996; Murphy, 1991; Warwick, 1995).

Oppression Against Neo-Paganism

Oppression of the Neo-Pagan stems from a long history of religious and political intolerance. The allegations made during the Middle Ages Witch Craze mirrored those against the Knights Templar, and other groups dubbed heretical, a threat to the beliefs of the faithful, by the Catholic Church. (Baigent et al., 1983; Burman, 1986; Sinclair, 1992). These claims include pacts with Satan, sacrifice of children, and other horrible acts. Not surprisingly, these are the same allegations made against modern Neo-Pagans. Like the heretic of old, the modern Neo-Pagan may be looked at as a threat to other religions, especially those who focus on fear of and submission to the deity, for Neo-Paganism focus's on a the joy of live, not just the sorrow (Adler, 1986, Crowley, 1996).

Historical Origins

The year 1484 marked the beginning of thousands of accusations of Witchcraft, followed by thousands of executions of Witches with confessions obtained under torture (Robbins, 1979). The Bull of Innocent VIII (Robbins, 1979) gave license for two Dominican priests named Kramer and Sprenger to compile a volume of instruction for inquisitors. These two sons of the Church were Professors of Theology, presumably suitably qualified to write a book on religious affairs. Unfortunately, the book they produced was The Malleus Maleficarum, the "Witches Hammer" (1487/1971). This book detailed how to identify, try, and kill Witches. The book outlined how Witches gained the power to change into animals, fly, cast illusions, seduce clergymen, and, of course, kill children. This book was the dominant word on Witchcraft throughout the Middle Ages (Kramer & Sprenger, 1487/1971).

It wasn't just in Europe that the church sanctioned-definition of Witches as servants of Satan was popular. In the United States, 200 years after the writing of The Malleus Maleficarum, theological experts, such as Cotton Mather, were also the experts on Witches. The spiritual zeitgeist was directed by Mather, a man who firmly believed in Satan. He believed that this evil entity had the will and ability to descend upon mankind and wreak havoc on human souls. Mather seemed to feel that it was through the piety of clergymen such as himself that the power of Satan was held at bay (1692/1991). The resulting impact on the populace in the early Americas included the Salem Witch Trials which were observed and informed by Mather. The hysteria concluded with the condemnation and death of 22 men and women, as well as dozens of accusations (Robbins, 1979).

Modern Acts Of Hate

If one were to assume that hatred of pagans is a thing of the past, one would be sadly mistaken. One has only to look as far as the media portrayal of witches and other pagans. There are those today who are convinced that the Neo-pagan movement is directed by Satan in a deliberate ploy to destroy good Christians (Acts 17:11, 1996; Marrs, 1989; Woodsong, 1996). These believers, like Mather, also feel it is their responsibility to provide a framework of salvation from the forces of Satan, which more closely resembles the paranoia of the Witch Craze (Marrs, 1989).

Slander Against

Portrayal of Witches with green skin, warts, and pointy hats is a Halloween tradition, a stereotyped portrayal which the general public generally condones. Sambo and Mammy stereotypes of African Americans. no longer are treated with such acceptance. Where one stereotyped image has been accepted as a negative portrayal of a people, the other has not. This may be due to ignorance of people who are unfamiliar with Neo-Paganism. However, this is increasingly unlikely due to increased media coverage of different religious groups. Primarily, the negative stereotypes of Neo-Pagans exists because of religious intolerance, primarily from the Religious Right (700 Club, 1996; Acts 17:11, 1996; Champion, 1996; Marrs, 1989). This is the twentieth century, with the year 2000 quickly approaching, yet there are still clergymen who believe, and who preach to their flocks, that there is a conspiracy of Witches seeking to infiltrate and subvert Christian Churches (Woodsong, 1996). Still others believe that Witchcraft requires child sacrifice, going so far as to state that "a revival of Neo-paganism has brought with it a revival of human sacrifice in the form of abortion" (Champion, 1996).

Slander against Neo-Pagans goes even deeper. The Acts 17:11 Bible Study group includes a unit on "those nasty Witches" (Acts 17:11, 1996). This course defines Witchcraft as "wanting to be a spiritual "mover and shaker" without submitting to God." This is true, since most Neo-Pagan groups seek individual empowerment over giving over oneself to an extrinsic deity (Warwick, 1995).

Multi-million dollar Christian organizations are just as slanderous as the small, unknown groups. The 700 club, for example, mistakenly states that

Druids were charged with appeasing the goblins and preventing harm to the people. Huge bonfires were lit to guide the way of the spirits. Various sacrifices--including human--were performed to assure a good year. Several ancient authors commented on the gory religious rites of the Druids. (1996, p. 1) Julius Ceasar was one of these ancient authors who wrote about the Druids. Like any military leader, his goal was to dehumanize the enemy. The Druids were a people who practiced human sacrifice. Recent archaeological data, however, suggests that the victims were volunteers (Piggott, 1985; ; Rutherford, 1990). One such volunteer was the Lindow Man, an 2000 year old body found in the Lindow Bog who turned out to be a Druid Prince who willingly gave his life to appease the gods and stop the Romans (Ross & Robbins, 1989). Modern Druids are a facet of Neo-Paganism which seeks to recreate the nature worship of the early Druids. In England, Druidic fellowships have drawn many dignitaries, including Winston Churchhill (Piggott, 1985). Isaac Bonewits spearheaded the Druidic movement in the United States, forming a synthesis of the early Druidic tradition with the modern Gaia worshipping movement (Adler, 1986).

Acts Of Oppression

Instances of oppression against Neo-Pagans are on the decline, but they are still a part of life for Neo-Pagans in the United States and in other countries. Neo-Pagans live with a constant threat of job loss, loss of child custody, and threats to home and body (Murphy, 1991; Warwick, 1995). Many in the Neo-Pagan movement have become civicly active, working to educate others in their communities. When necessary, they seek legal counsel and work within the civil and legal systems, often successfully, to ensure their civil and legal rights (Conrad, 1986; Lady Jane, 1994).

When acts of oppression are carried out against religious minorities, we often think they are carried out by religious zealots from equally fringe groups of the more traditional religions. This is not the case. More than once, Senator Jesse Helms, among others, have put forth house rulings to deny any church which considered itself Witch to be denied tax exempt status (Alexandre, 1985). Thankfully, the District Court of Virginia and the Federal Appeals Court, fourth circuit, have ruled that "Witchcraft is a legitimate religion and falls within a recognizable religious category" (WLPA, 1996a).

Acts of violence occur against Neo-Pagans, and even people suspected of being Neo-Pagan. In North Dakota, "two men were charged conspiring to murder a neighbor they thought was a Witch" (Wylundt, 1990, p. 18). Other countries have equally, if not worse, instances of Witch hysteria. Burkina Faso, a country in West Africa, over 600 women were accused of Witchcraft and banished from their homes, often by family, (Wotany, 1995).
Zoning of Neo-Pagan churches has been a reoccurring battle. The Circle Sanctuary in Wisconsin was one of the first such churches to face unfair zoning laws based on religion. Currently, the Church of the Iron Oak is going through similar litigation regarding religious activities taking place in a private home (Aerlyn, 1994; Conrad, 1986; Lady Jane, 1994). A couple in Jonesbora, Arkansas were run out of the store they had rented and were refused space by more than 32 landlords because they had opened an occult supply and book store. Five ministers got on the television and urged the landlords not to rent to the couple because "those kinds of things do not belong in a Christian community" (Shapiro & Glick, 1993). Like Circle Sanctuary and Iron Oak, the Arkansas couple is pursuing legal solutions to their problems.

Internal Oppression

Like other minority groups, Neo-Pagans face not just oppression from outside their group, but from inside as well. In an interview, Selena Fox, the High Priestess of Circle Sanctuary, referred to "infighting and toxic gossip mongering" among Neo-Pagans (Murphy, 1991). It is unfortunate, but much of the damage done to the Neo-Pagan movement comes not from without, but from within.

Witch wars

Within the Neo-Pagan movement, the variety of traditions often leads to conflict between groups with differing views. When these differences reach a volatile state, a Witch war ensues. Unfortunately, most of these lead to acts of slander and character assassination. These acts happen all across the United States. In Georgia, a Neo-Pagan owner of a soup kitchen was outed (exposed) and defamed (Lady Cerridwen, 1991). North Carolina was host to a conflict which affected over 300 people and shattered a community (Williams, 1995). Even in Lincoln, Nebraska, traditions enter conflict, vying for dominance, a posture which rubs against Neo-Pagan philosophy (Blodgett-McDeavitt, 1995).

Negative role models. Spokespersons for Neo-Paganism who discredit the movement by their actions come in two forms. Many are embarrassments to the movement, others are dangerous. Annie Sprinkle is, to most members of the Neo-Pagan movement, an embarrassment. She is a pornographic "actress", conceptual artist, and practicing Witch. Unfortunately, her version of Witchcraft seems more suitable as erotica than it is a serious religious expression (Kelly, 1995).

The darker side of negative spokespersons are those who perpetuate the stereotypes. Books such as The Magic Power of Witchcraft focus on the darker aspects of Neo-Paganism, including how to dominate people and how to harm your enemies (Frost & Frost, 1977). This fosters an image of the wicked Witch, a mythic image which many Neo-Pagans have been attempting to dispel (Adler, 1986).

Hope For The Future

The Frosts and Ms. Sprinkle, although very visible, do not represent the whole of the Neo-Pagan movement. There are very many professionals from many walks of life, students to professors, housewives to consultants (Unger, 1990). Personalities such as National Public Radio corespondent Margot Adler and actress Olympia Dukakis are public role models who are not negative (Murphy, 1991; Unger, 1990).

Some researchers have examined the benefits that the Neo-Pagan movement has to it's members. Connections to the old goddesses, such as Demeter, Brigid, and Persephone are archetypal images which women, and men, can use to empower themselves. A paradigm shift occurs as people get more attuned to the Neo-Pagan perspective, a shift from an ideology of self to an ideology of connectedness with the universe (Warwick, 1995). Psychologist James Hillman takes it further, in his discourse on the need to return to the old gods to build our souls and to experience the pluralist universe (1975).

Conclusion

The Neo-Pagan movement is one marked by diversity, both in the members and in the means of expression. Neo-Paganism may not reach the same place in society as the traditional religions, but it is clear that Neo-Paganism is a path for those who are interested in forming a personal connection with the divine of their choice and are not content with giving that power to a central religious leader (Adler, 1996).

Neo-Pagans face opposition from the religious right. Many of these are fundamentalists, who follow the belief that "an open mind is a cesspool of thought" (Acts 17:11, 1996), which is anathema to the Neo-Pagan sense of spiritual growth (Adler, 1986).

In the face of this opposition, Neo-Pagans are finding acceptance in mainstream society. The Unitarian Universalist Church, which has it's roots in Christianity, accepts not just Neo-Pagans, but homosexuals in their congregations, and as their ministry (Lady Jane, 1994). Neo-Pagan spokespersons such as Margot Adler and Starhawk have been asked to speak at many universities about the movement, and many museums are showing exhibits of the goddess in varied forms, from different cultures (Unger, 1990).

Unlike many minority groups, Neo-Pagans, generally, have access to the resources, information, and education to defend themselves. They also tend to be well networked. Some religions have found themselves mired in tradition, unwilling to change with the times. Neo-Paganism views religion as it views nature. It is meant to wax and wane with the coming and going of the seasons, to ebb and flow with the changing of society (Adler, 1986).
The diversity, independence, and ability to change are qualities which enable Neo-Pagans to weather the oppressive elements that are presented to them. Networking and a sense of global community keep Neo-Pagans from across the United States from being isolated while the fundamentalists seek to defame and destroy the movement. Neo-Pagans are survivors, who have refused to buckle under to the stress and strain of hostile local governments and churches. Numerous Neo-Pagan groups have achieved recognized status, and the Department of Defense recognizes Wicca, as well as other Pagan traditions, as valid religions (Department of the Army, 1991). Neo-Pagans may never be understood or respected by those who oppress them, but we are protected by the same government. Through education and political activism, Neo-Pagans are setting the stage to ensure that their rights are upheld.

References
  • 700 Club (1996). Halloween. [online]. Available World Wide Web: http://the700club.org/cbn/teach/hal2.html [1996, August 5]
  • Acts 17:11 (1996). Witchcraft Bible Study. [online]. Available World Wide Web: http://www.acts17-11.com/witchcraft.html [1996, August 5]
  • Acts 17:11 (1996). Witchcraft Intro For Witches. [online]. Available World Wide Web: http://www.acts17-11.com/witchcraft_wicca.html [1996, August 5].
  • Adler, M. (1986). Drawing Down the Moon: Witches, Druids, Goddess-Worshippers, and Other Pagans in America Today. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Aerlyn, J. (1994). Wiccan group charges Florida municipality with violation of first amendment rights. Pagan Press, 3(4), 1-2.
  • Alexandre, N. C. (1985). What freedom??? Tara, 1. 3.
  • Andrews, T. (1993). The occult christ. St. paul: Llewellyn.
  • Appel, W. (1983). Cults in America: Programmed for paradise. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  • Armstrong, K. (1993). A history of God. New York: Ballantine.
  • Baigent, M., Leigh, R., & Lincoln, H. (1983). Holy Blood, Holy Grail. New York: Dell.
  • Blodgett-McDeavitt, J. J. (1995, July/August). Witch wars in Lincoln. The Balefire, 2(9 & 10), 4.
  • Burman, E. (1984). The Inquisition: Hammer of Heresy. New York: Dorset.
  • Burman, E. (1986). The Templars: Knights of God. Rochester, Vermont: Destiny.
  • Champion (1996). Statements of a practicing witch? [online]. Available World Wide Web: http://www.forerunner.com/champion/X0041_Statements_of_a_prac.html [1996, August 5]
  • Chafets, Z. (1985). Double vision. New York: William Morrow and Company.
  • Conrad, G. (1986, November 14). Wiccan priestess to fight ban by Iowa county board. The Capital Times.
  • Crowley, V. (1996). Principles of Paganism. San Francisco: Thorsons.
  • Department of the Army Office of the Chief of Chaplains (1991). Religious requirements and practices of certain selected groups: A handbook for chaplains. Washington, DC: Department of Defense.
  • Farrar, S. (1971). What Witches do: The modern coven revealed. New York: Coward, McCann & Geochegan.
  • Finley, N. J. (1991). Political activism and feminist spirituality. Sociological Analysis, 52(4), 349-362.
  • Fox, R. E. (1986). Pagans and Christians. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
  • Frazer, J. G. (1922/1963). The golden bough: A study in magic and religion. New York: Collier Books.
  • Frost, G. & Frost, Y. (1977). The magic power of Witchcraft. New York: Parker Publishing Company.
  • Gardner, G. B. (1974). Witchcraft today. Secaucus, NJ: The Citadel Press.
  • Graves. R. (1948/1986). The white goddess. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Griffin, W. (1995). The embodied goddess: Feminist Witchcraft and female divinity. Sociology of Religion, 56(1), 35-48.
  • Hillman, J. (1975). Re-visioning psychology. New York: HarperPerennial.
  • Kelly, C. (1995, September 11). This, too, is the Hamptons. New York, 28.(36), 36.
  • Kramer, H. & Sprenger, J. (1487/1971). The Malleus Maleficarum. New York: Dover.
  • Lady Cerridwen (1991). Wiccan slander - when will it end? The Sword of Dyrnwyn, 3(4), 7-9.
  • Lady Jane (1994-95, Winter). And now the news... Green Egg, 27(107), 56-57.
  • Marrs, T. (1989). Ravaged by the New Age: Satan's plan to destroy our kids. Austin, TX: Living Truth.
  • Mather, C. (1692/1991). On Witchcraft. New York: Dorset.
  • Minges, P. (1996). Church Burnings. [online]. Available World Wide Web: http://www.users.interport.net/~wovaka/churchburn.html [1996, August 8]
  • Murphy, R. (1991 November/December). Neo-Pagans celebrate rites of the Earth. Utne Reader. 22-26.
  • Murray, M. (1960). The god of the Witches. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
  • Pagels, E. (1995). The origin of Satan. New York: Random House.
  • Piggott, S. (1975). The Druids. New York: Thames and Hudson.
  • Ringel, F. (1994). New England Neo-Pagans: Medievalism, fantasy, religion. Journal of American Culture, 17 3, 65-68.
  • Robbins, R. H. (1979). The encyclopedia of Witchcraft and Demonology. New York: Bonanza.
  • Ross, A. & Robbins, D. (1989). The life and death of a Druid prince: The Story of Lindow Man. New York: Summit.
  • Russell, J. B. (1985). A history of Witchcraft. Sorcerers, heretics and Pagans. New York: Thames and Hudson.
  • Rutherford, W. (1978). The Druids: Magicians of the West. New York: Sterling.
  • Sinclair, A. (1992). The sword and the grail. New York: Crown.
  • Shapiro, L. & Click, D. (1993, August 23). Do you believe in magick? Newsweek, 32
  • Szlakmann, C. (1984). Judaism for beginners. New York: Writers and Readers.
  • Unger, R. (1990, July 4). Oh, Goddess! New York, 23(22), 41-46.
  • Warwick, L. L. (1995). Feminist Wicca: Paths to empowerment. Women & Therapy, 16(2/3), 121-133.
  • Williams, J. (1995, July/August). Wiccan Fundamentalism. The Balefire, 2(9 & 10), 3-4.
  • Witches League of Public Awareness (1996a). The Witches' law memorandum. [online]. Available World Wide Web: http://www.CelticCrow.com/lawmem.html [1996, July 31]
  • Witches League of Public Awareness (1996b). The do's and don'ts of Witches'. [online]. Available World Wide Web: http://www.CelticCrow.com/doos.html [1996, July 31]
  • Woodsong, R. (1996). Right watch summer 1996. [online]. Available World Wide Web: http://rainbow.rmii.com/~warren/right6.thm [1996, August 5]
  • Wotany, E. (1995). Thou shalt not suffer a Witch. Index on Censorship, 24(4), 78-80.
  • Wylundt (1990, Winter). Two accused of plotting to murder 'Witch'. Silver Chalice, 1 3, 18